In my last post,โฏ Iโฏexamined the first four of seven toxic workplace traits and provided Biblical supportโฏto each section. For today, I want to conclude this series with my final three attributesโฏalong with a recap pod summarizing my points. As a reminder, while weโre exploring culturalโฏand environmental red flags, weโre not hiding fromโฏleadership issues as the topics ultimately cannot be detached.โฏ
Without further ado, letโsโฏtie a bow onโฏthisโฆ

5)โฏInconsistent Leadership
โฏWhen we talk about toxic work cultures, there are several dismissive characteristics we could cite from narcissism to manipulation toโฏarrogance; however, thereโs one, in particular, encompassing a multitude and that is incongruence (I.e. when a person’s actions contrast their words).
Ask any leader or tenured employee with authority and theyโll admit responsibility and accountability are essential to positive team performance and morale. Yet, where there are inconsistenciesโฏbetween expectation and execution, thereโฏisโฏroom for misinterpretation, miscommunication, tolerance, even negative emulation down the line.โฏ โฏ
The good news here is the fix doesnโt have to be complicated: If youโre a team lead, supervisor, or director, walk the talk.

For example, if you say youโre not a micromanager, donโt micromanage, even if your intent is to the contrary. Rather, assess your intent to probe past normality and be willing to receive feedback if the actions involvedโฏcommunicate distrust or produce uncomfortable vibes. Remember seeking clarity is one thing but second-guessing motives without compassion, grace, and understanding is another.โฏ
If you struggle to model any of these qualities, dare to explore any area where intention and action arenโt aligned. Naturally, no one should want to be inconsistent in their work; hence, why leaders especially should understandโฏconsistency isnโt limited to the fruit ofโฏoneโsโฏhands but also the words ofโฏtheirโฏmouth and the reflections ofโฏtheirโฏheart.โฏ
Supporting Bible verses: Psalm 19,โฏMatthew 7:3, Mathew 23:3, Luke 16:13, 1 Corinthians 15:58, Galatians 6:9, 1โฏJohn 4:20
6) โฏOvertoleranceโฏand Permissiveness
To be fair, this point flows from the one prior, but based on perceived abuse, this warrants a separate explanation.โฏIf youโฏsay certain actions wonโt be tolerated, donโt make the principles behind them conditional. Instead of granting exceptions based on seat or situation, handle moral failures and detrimental conducts consistently regardless if the person involved in an established personality or rookie within their probationary period.
From what Iโve seen, the top-down ripple effect of steady rationale and decision making can be empowering in the long term, even if itโs messy in the short term. Whenever trust bends or breaks, abiding by proper protocol willโฏnot onlyโฏenhance securityโฏbut alsoโฏencourage people to adhere toโฏhigherโฏstandards of integrity.โฏ
Put another way,โฏif youโre a leader,โฏdonโt sacrifice reproach by synonymizing forgiveness and tolerance.โฏIf an employee has an established track record of poor conduct, scale the offense, and timely oversee the appropriate actionsโฏin a way that benefitsโฏthe whole of the team.โฏWhen in doubt, just say โnoโ to permissiveness and โyesโ to due diligence and follow-through.ย ย ย
Supporting Bible verses:โฏProverbs 21:16,โฏRomans 6:1-2, 11-15;โฏ2 Timothy 4:1-2, Ephesians 4:2, 1 Peter 3:8-11
7) โฏLack of awareness and accountabilityโฏ
No workplace is perfect, and employees, leaders and teams may display negative traits from time to time. However, if that behavior is pervasive, leadership must consider how the culture theyโve cultivated may be impacting the trend. Unless a single employee is the root of the hostility, a leader best serves their company by investigating beyond the conflict into its source region.
Often, if an employee starts deregulating, thereโs a corporate tie-in, be it a lack of recognition/development, unclear communications, and/or insecurity. Yet, even if these currents arenโt underlying, there could be larger problems involving personal, domestic, and/or health issues, which leads me to a key point:
When a work boundary is breached, donโt automatically assume ill-intent but gauge the transparency of your corporate principles and reassess them before the repercussions.
Tweet
Handled the right way, a potentially volatile situation can de-escalate into a refreshing reset when humility meets resolution. Conversely, if a leadership committee lacks awareness and accountability, the employee will almost always follow suit.
For instance, you may have a teammate or subordinate who acts ignorantly at times. Yet perhaps he/she feels ignored, like a number within a company that hoards autonomy and withholds clarity. In these cases, donโt deal with the contention topically but with meekness that anticipates understanding.
โCause truth is: If leaders and teams don’t take inventory of their internal processes and how they affect personnel, discouragement, even burn-out will inevitably result. Why not rightfully deal and scale tension internally before your clients and supporters smell smoke?
Supporting Bible verses: Proverbs 11:14, Proverbs 27:17, Ephesians 4:15, James 5:16, Hebrews 10:24-25, 1 Thessalonians 5:11
As always, selah, thank you for reaching and…

Cover photo creds: Wellable















